Testing / PractiTest Interview Questions
Why does PractiTest allow unlimited custom fields on Requirements, Tests, and Issues?
Every organization structures its QA process a little differently, so a fixed set of built-in fields would inevitably be too rigid for some teams and missing fields for others.
- Unlimited custom fields let each team model its own process, whether that's tracking a Browser field on Requirements or a Root Cause field on Issues
- Custom fields feed directly into filters and dashboard graphs, so this flexibility extends into reporting, not just data entry
- Supports smoother migration from other tools, since imported data can map onto fields that match a team's existing terminology instead of forcing a rename
This flexibility is explicitly called out as one of PractiTest's more valued features, precisely because it lets the tool adapt to a team's process instead of the other way around.
Why would a fixed set of built-in fields be a problem?
How do custom fields extend beyond data entry?
More Related questions...
